Texas A&M-CC
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
167  Patrick Kimeli SR 32:08
469  Philipp Baar SO 32:51
915  Abel Koskey JR 33:38
998  Christoph Hintz SO 33:46
1,180  Daniel Barlow SR 34:02
1,252  Adrian Marquez SR 34:08
1,257  Paul Hansel SO 34:08
1,349  Julian Pfeiffer FR 34:16
1,629  Jacob Abrego JR 34:39
2,007  Valentinas Rudys SO 35:16
2,612  Brandon Lacy SO 36:28
National Rank #94 of 311
South Central Region Rank #8 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 2.6%
Top 10 in Regional 98.7%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Patrick Kimeli Philipp Baar Abel Koskey Christoph Hintz Daniel Barlow Adrian Marquez Paul Hansel Julian Pfeiffer Jacob Abrego Valentinas Rudys Brandon Lacy
TAMUCC Islander Splash 09/28 1064 32:38 32:46 34:04 33:29 33:26 34:18 34:43 36:31
Chile Pepper Festival 10/13 963 31:47 32:38 33:37 33:30 33:57 34:12 33:54 35:17
Southland Conference Championships 10/26 1077 32:19 33:11 33:47 33:50 34:09 34:16 34:29 34:37
South Central Region Championships 11/09 1013 31:57 32:53 33:15 34:12 34:33 35:02





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 7.9 239 0.0 2.6 12.2 20.4 28.2 31.2 4.0 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Patrick Kimeli 38.9% 124.0
Philipp Baar 0.3% 205.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Patrick Kimeli 15.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.7 1.7 3.4 4.9 6.7 7.6 9.0 8.5 6.8 6.4 6.1 5.6 4.3 4.1 3.4 3.1 3.1 2.7 2.0
Philipp Baar 30.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.5 2.9 3.0 4.2 5.0 4.8
Abel Koskey 56.0
Christoph Hintz 62.6
Daniel Barlow 74.6
Adrian Marquez 78.0
Paul Hansel 78.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.0% 0.0 4
5 2.6% 2.6 5
6 12.2% 12.2 6
7 20.4% 20.4 7
8 28.2% 28.2 8
9 31.2% 31.2 9
10 4.0% 4.0 10
11 1.0% 1.0 11
12 0.3% 0.3 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0